Keyword summary
⁠22%2 analyzed articles/videos912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marsha Summersill results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (42,976 of 55,623 keywords). This Marsha Summersill is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Marsha Summersill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠23%Marsha Summersill (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos