Keyword summary
60%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Sanchez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,841 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,507 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Mark Sanchez
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Mark Sanchez (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,841
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos