Keyword summary
25%1 analyzed article/video1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Meuser results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Self-Serving Bias, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 664 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,756 of 37,374 keywords). This Mark Meuser is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Mark Meuser
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
24%Mark Meuser (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos