Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Lamb results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,301 hits . Analysis detected 7,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,388 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,986 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Lamb is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Mark Lamb
Keyword details
Total words: 8,388
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst