Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariscos results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Bandwagon , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,340 hits . Analysis detected 7,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,574 of 37,536 keywords). This Mariscos is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Mariscos
Keyword details
Total words: 9,628
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst