Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mamdani Backed Candidates results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 3,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,594 of 37,536 keywords). This Mamdani Backed Candidates is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Mamdani Backed Candidates
Keyword details
Total words: 1,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.8% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 29.1% 29.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 24.5% 24.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst