Keyword summary
48% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mamdani Administration results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,307 hits . Analysis detected 9,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,362 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,108 of 35,541 keywords). This Mamdani Administration is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Mamdani Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 13,362
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst