Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malnutrition results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 2,813 hits . Analysis detected 13,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,242 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (8,803 of 34,833 keywords). This Malnutrition is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Malnutrition
Keyword details
Total words: 8,242
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 34.1% 34.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 25.0% 25.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst