Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Macklin Celebrini results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 621 hits . Analysis detected 3,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,200 of 37,536 keywords). This Macklin Celebrini is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Macklin Celebrini
Keyword details
Total words: 4,316
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst