Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These M V Ever Lovely results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,327 of 37,536 keywords). This M V Ever Lovely is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
M V Ever Lovely
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
81%M V Ever Lovely (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles976 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos