Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Beliefs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 675 hits . Analysis detected 3,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,762 of 37,536 keywords). This Luxury Beliefs is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Luxury Beliefs
Keyword details
Total words: 2,316
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 29.1% 29.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst