Keyword summary
33% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis De La Fuente results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hindsight Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,653 hits . Analysis detected 8,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,525 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,226 of 37,536 keywords). This Luis De La Fuente is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Luis De La Fuente
Keyword details
Total words: 10,525
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst