Keyword summary
38% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisville results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,507 hits . Analysis detected 10,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,794 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,925 of 35,675 keywords). This Louisville is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Louisville
Keyword details
Total words: 15,794
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst