Keyword summary
⁠65%5 analyzed articles/videos1,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisa Gag results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,570 hits. Analysis detected 8,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,487 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (28,405 of 36,925 keywords). This Louisa Gag is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Louisa Gag
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠24%Louisa Gag (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,487
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos