Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Rams results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 745 hits . Analysis detected 5,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,315 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,281 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles Rams is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Los Angeles Rams
Keyword details
Total words: 3,315
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.5% 22.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst