Keyword summary
63%1 analyzed article/video717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Little Red Dots results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,151 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,679 of 37,536 keywords). This Little Red Dots is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Little Red Dots
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Little Red Dots (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,151
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos