Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Listen Time 281 results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,742 of 37,536 keywords). This Listen Time 281 is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Listen Time 281
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Listen Time 281 (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos