The Greatest Sword Ever Made Was Passed Down for Centuries—then Vanished Into Thin Air 29%

By Darren Orf35%

7/10/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 826 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,744 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the article peer group.

Brian Kennedy // Getty Images 
Here’s what you’ll learn when you read this story: 
Of the thousands of incredible swordsmiths throughout Japanese history, none compare to Gorō Nyūdō Masamune, who created some of the country’s most lasting treasures. 
One of those treasures is the Hōnjo Masamune, a sword wielded by some of Japan’s most famous historical figures, including Tokugawa Ieyasu—the founder of the Tokugawa Shogunate. 
Despite being declared a national treasure in 1939, the sword vanished during Japan’s surrender to Allied Forces at the end of World War II. 
Japan is renowned for many things, but few nations rival its legacy of sword-making. 
That lineage of steel-based perfection owes much to one 13 th -century swordsmith: Gorō Nyūdō Masamune. 
Masamune—who lived from 1264 until 1343 C.E., a period when samurai warriors steadily gained power throughout the island nation—is regarded by many historians as perhaps the greatest swordsmith in Japanese history. 
His most famous innovation is his mastery of nie —large, visible martensite crystals that create striking visual effects in the steel. 
The effects is achieved through differential hardening, a process through which the spine of the sword is coated in thick clay so it cools more slowly than the edge during quenching. 
This leaves the edge hard and sharp while keeping the spine flexible and resilient. 
Masamune’s magnum opus is widely considered to be a sword known as the Hōnjo Masamune. 
Masamune swords that survive to this day typically have two names—the name of a clan or important historical figure who owned the sword, and the name of the swordsmith himself. 
Although Masamune forged the weapon around the turn of the 14 th century, it would only become known as the Hōnjo Masamune centuries later when famous general Hōnjo Shigenaga wielded the weapon in service to the Uesugi clan. 
The story goes that during the fourth Battle of Kawanakajima, the Masamune-forged weapon sliced Shigenaga’s helmet in half, but the famous general survived the encounter and claimed the sword as his own. 
While the sword was prized by Shigenaga for years afterward, he eventually sold it in 1595 to the Toyotomi clan, who ruled Japan at the time. 
With the clan’s dissolution in 1615 and the rise of the Tokugawa Ieyasu—arguably one of the most important figures in Japan’s history—the sword became a hereditary symbol of power during the Tokugawa Shogunate. 
Despite the clan’s downfall in the late 19 th century, the family held on to the sword, and the weapon was officially declared a national treasure in 1939. 
But its centuries-long journey would finally reach its most perplexing chapter at the tail end of World War II . 
On August 15, 1945, Japan unconditionally surrendered to Allied forces, officially ending the deadliest war in human history. 
As part of the terms of that surrender, Japan was required to relinquish all of its weapons, including samurai swords. 
Accordingly, Tokugawa Iemasa—a descendent of Ieyasu—surrendered the Hōnjo Masamune at Mejiro police station in Tokyo in December of 1945. 
Tokugawa Iemasa hoped to set an example of cooperation with the Allied Occupation for his fellow citizens, but after surrendering the blade, it was never seen again. 
The story gets stranger. 
On January 18, the Mejiro police said that a man named  Sgt. 
Coldy Bimore  collected the swords for the Foreign Liquidations Commission, but no one assigned to collect Japanese weapons went by that name. 
The Allied forces started melting swords (or even throwing some into the sea), but General Douglas MacArthur halted the destruction of swords later that year after learning that many of them were simply family heirlooms. 
To this day, no one knows where the Hōnjo Masamune might be. 
There are vague, unsubstantiated theories, but no concrete proof. 
However, not all hope is lost. 
In 2013, a private collector brought a sword to the Kyoto National Museum that was confirmed to be the lost Shimazu Masamune, a creation of the same legendary swordsmith who created the much-treasured Hōnjo Masamune. 
If one of Masamune’s sword could re-emerge after so long, may be the Hōnjo Masamune can as well. 
The legendary sword might remain missing for now, but the search continues. 
Darren lives in Portland, has a cat, and writes/edits about sci-fi and how our world works. 
You can find his previous stuff at Gizmodo and Paste if you look hard enough. 
4 Black Eggs Surfaced From the Deep Ocean 
Is the ‘Betz Mystery Sphere’ Really Alien Tech? 
We May Have Been Wrong About the Origin of Life 
Stuck Stem Cells Culprit for Gray Hair 
An 1877 El Niño Wreaked Havoc. 
It May Do So Again. 
Scientists Just Solved a Major Coffin Mystery 
Chernobyl Stewards May Pass Mutations to Children 
Earth’s Hidden Eighth Continent Is No Longer Lost 
A Breakthrough Treatment Could Reverse Blindness 
Quantum Gravity May Unlock an Antigravity Machine 
Tiny Humans Could Rewrite the Story of Evolution 
The Truth Behind Japan’s “Atlantis” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Darren Orf: 4.6%Popular Mechanics: 4.4%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Darren Orf: 4.3%Popular Mechanics: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.4%This article: 9.1%Darren Orf: 1.9%Popular Mechanics: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic9.1%This article: 2.9%Darren Orf: 2.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.8%Hindsight Bias2.9%This article: 4.8%Darren Orf: 2.7%Popular Mechanics: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 9.9%Darren Orf: 4.0%Popular Mechanics: 3.6%Framing Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Darren Orf: 0.9%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 3.4%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.4%This article: 6.8%Darren Orf: 3.5%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 5.3%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 10.9%Darren Orf: 6.2%Popular Mechanics: 5.3%Negativity Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.2%Darren Orf: 2.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.9%Halo Effect20.2%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Darren Orf: 1.2%Popular Mechanics: 1.2%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 1.1%Darren Orf: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.9%Darren Orf: 7.7%Popular Mechanics: 5.5%Appeal to Authority13.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.8%Darren Orf: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.8%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Darren Orf: 4.5%Popular Mechanics: 4.2%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.4%Darren Orf: 3.7%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion3.4%This article: 0.6%Darren Orf: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Begging the Question0.6%This article: 11.9%Darren Orf: 3.7%Popular Mechanics: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.7%Darren Orf: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Burden of Proof4.7%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.8%Popular Mechanics: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.7%Darren Orf: 3.3%Popular Mechanics: 2.6%Anecdotal6.7%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%Darren Orf: 2.3%Popular Mechanics: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Darren Orf: 2.4%Popular Mechanics: 1.4%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 20.0%Darren Orf: 8.0%Popular Mechanics: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice20.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.6%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

826 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.