Keyword summary
84%2 analyzed articles/videos1,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Stark results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 3,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,351 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,621 of 34,417 keywords). This Lisa Stark is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Lisa Stark
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
58%Lisa Stark (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,351
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate