Keyword summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Nandy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 382 hits . Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,499 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,239 of 37,536 keywords). This Lisa Nandy is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Lisa Nandy
Keyword details
Total words: 2,499
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst