Keyword summary
22%1 analyzed article/video308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lil Durk results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 854 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,765 of 37,536 keywords). This Lil Durk is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Lil Durk
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Lil Durk (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos