Keyword summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Likud results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 1,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,922 of 36,715 keywords). This Likud is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Likud
Keyword details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst