Keyword summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lestat results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,046 hits. Analysis detected 6,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,253 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,054 of 36,718 keywords). This Lestat is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Lestat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
51%Lestat (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,253
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos