Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura-Loomer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (10,104 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura-Loomer is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Laura-Loomer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%Laura-Loomer (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos