Keyword summary
33%6 analyzed articles/videos5,254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lamine Yamal results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 3,005 hits. Analysis detected 14,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,804 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,554 of 37,536 keywords). This Lamine Yamal is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Lamine Yamal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Lamine Yamal (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate