Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labubu results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,119 hits. Analysis detected 8,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,280 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,495 of 37,536 keywords). This Labubu is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Labubu
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
62%Labubu (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,280
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos