Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Labour Party Leadership results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,392 hits. Analysis detected 12,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,307 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Labour Party Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Labour Party Leadership
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 13,307
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos