Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kiran Stacey results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 666 hits . Analysis detected 5,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kiran Stacey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kiran Stacey
Author details
Total words: 5,072
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 13.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst