Keyword summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kindness results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 2,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (12,993 of 37,536 keywords). This Kindness is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Kindness
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠66%Kindness (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos