Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These K Pop results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 396 hits . Analysis detected 2,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,938 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,540 of 37,536 keywords). This K Pop is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. K Pop
Keyword details
Total words: 4,938
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst