Keyword summary
16%6 analyzed articles/videos7,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Bieber results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 1,735 hits. Analysis detected 11,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,383 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Justin Bieber is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Justin Bieber
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
4%Justin Bieber (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate