Keyword summary
16% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Bieber results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 1,735 hits . Analysis detected 11,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,383 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Justin Bieber is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Justin Bieber
Keyword details
Total words: 25,383
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst