Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judge Mark Pittman results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 2,092 hits . Analysis detected 10,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,773 of 37,536 keywords). This Judge Mark Pittman is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group. Judge Mark Pittman
Keyword details
Total words: 8,888
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst