Keyword summary
44% 2 analyzed articles/videos 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Pickford results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 952 hits . Analysis detected 5,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,990 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,275 of 37,536 keywords). This Jordan Pickford is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Jordan Pickford
Keyword details
Total words: 4,990
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst