Author summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kari Anderson results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 2,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (910 of 6,359 authors). This Kari Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Kari Anderson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠86%Kari Anderson (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.2%34.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Fundamental Attribution E
Sitewide 2.7%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos