Keyword summary
74% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Swan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 2,415 hits . Analysis detected 12,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,320 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,946 of 35,157 keywords). This Jonathan Swan is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Jonathan Swan
Keyword details
Total words: 11,320
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst