Keyword summary
54%3 analyzed articles/videos10,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Haidt results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 5,995 hits. Analysis detected 32,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,752 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,646 of 37,536 keywords). This Jonathan Haidt is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Jonathan Haidt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
13%Jonathan Haidt (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 38,752
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles38.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos