Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Brash results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 490 hits . Analysis detected 2,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,813 of 37,533 keywords). This Jonathan Brash is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Jonathan Brash
Keyword details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst