Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Leguizamo results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,231 hits . Analysis detected 7,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,960 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,452 of 37,536 keywords). This John Leguizamo is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. John Leguizamo
Keyword details
Total words: 8,960
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst