Keyword summary
88%2 analyzed articles/videos708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Employees results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 3,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,155 of 37,536 keywords). This Jewish Employees is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Jewish Employees
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Jewish Employees (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.6% percentile
5.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate