Keyword summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jens Stoltenberg results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 964 hits . Analysis detected 6,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (13,072 of 37,536 keywords). This Jens Stoltenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Jens Stoltenberg
Keyword details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst