Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jean Luc Melenchon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 5,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,908 of 37,536 keywords). This Jean Luc Melenchon is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Jean Luc Melenchon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Jean Luc Melenchon (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.1%37.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 50.1%50.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.7%23.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 50.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos