Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmine Crockett results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 801 hits . Analysis detected 5,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,002 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,713 of 34,834 keywords). This Jasmine Crockett is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Jasmine Crockett
Keyword details
Total words: 5,002
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst