Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jakob Larsen results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,056 hits . Analysis detected 4,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,605 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Jakob Larsen is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Jakob Larsen
Keyword details
Total words: 6,605
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst