Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Varghese results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,094 hits. Analysis detected 3,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (23,058 of 35,675 keywords). This Jacob Varghese is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Jacob Varghese
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
36%Jacob Varghese (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos