Keyword summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Cutbirth results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 268 hits . Analysis detected 1,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (50,826 of 55,180 keywords). This Jacob Cutbirth is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Jacob Cutbirth
Keyword details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst