Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J Edgar Hoover results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,005 of 37,536 keywords). This J Edgar Hoover is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
J Edgar Hoover
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%J Edgar Hoover (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos