Keyword summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israeli Ambassador To The UN Danny Danon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 3,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (15,944 of 53,656 keywords). This Israeli Ambassador To The UN Danny Danon is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Israeli Ambassador To The UN Danny Danon
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos