Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Lebanon Ceasefire results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,016 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (23,333 of 34,565 keywords). This Israel Lebanon Ceasefire is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Israel Lebanon Ceasefire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
33%Israel Lebanon Ceasefire (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos