Keyword summary
59% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investigative Journalism results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 3,069 hits . Analysis detected 26,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,854 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,615 of 35,635 keywords). This Investigative Journalism is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Investigative Journalism
Keyword details
Total words: 40,854
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles40.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst