Keyword summary
51% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Invasive Species results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,324 hits . Analysis detected 9,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,582 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,926 of 35,444 keywords). This Invasive Species is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Invasive Species
Keyword details
Total words: 12,582
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst